Ahead of print

Original article

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Two Dispersive Hyaluronate OVDs Used in Cataract Surgery

Full Text links

Summary

Purpose: To compare safety and efficacy of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) – OphteisBio 3.0 (Rayner) and Healon Endocoat (J&J Vision) in phacoemulsification cataract removal surgery.

Materials and Methods: In this prospective subject/evaluator-masked post-market randomized study patients undergoing phacoemulsification were assigned to receive one of two hyaluronate-based OVDs – OphteisBio 3.0 and Healon Endocoat. The outcomes were the rate of intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes ≥ 30 mmHg at the 7-day postoperative visit, endothelial cell density changes, the surgeon acceptance rate, IOP change from baseline, rates of inflammation and rates of serious and/or device-related adverse events.

Results: The study included 293 eyes – 146 in the Ophteis group and 147 in the Healon group. No IOP spikes were noted at the 7-day postoperative visit with mean IOP of 14.5 mmHg for Ophteis group and 14.3 mmHg for the Healon group. The mean endothelial cell density loss after the surgery was 9.8% in the Ophteis group and 10.2% in the Healon group with no statistically significant difference between the two OVD groups (p = 0.6292). At the 7-day visit, anterior chamber flare was absent in 98% and 99% of eyes in the Ophteis and Healon group, respectively. 82% of eyes had no anterior chamber cells at 7-day visit in both groups. No adverse events were recorded during surgery and at 7-day follow up. No clinically relevant differences were found between the two OVDs.

Conclusion: Ophteis 3.0 and Healon Endocoat have comparable results following phacoemulsification surgery.

References

  1. Miyata K, Nagamoto T, Maruoka S, et al. Efficacy and safety of the soft-shell technique in cases with a hard lens nucleus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1546-1550. doi.org/10.1016/S0886- 3350(02)01323-8
  2. Vajpayee RB, Verma K, Sinha R, et al. Comparative evaluation of efficacy and safety of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in phacoemulsification. BMC Ophthalmol. 2005;5:17. doi.org/10.1186/1471- 2415-5-17
  3. Storr-Paulsen A, Nørregaard JC, Farik G, et al. The influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelial cell population during cataract surgery: A prospective study of cohesive and dispersive viscoelastics. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:183-187. doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00784.x
  4. Moschos mm, Chatziralli IP, Sergentanis TN. Viscoat versus Visthesia during phacoemulsification cataract surgery: corneal and foveal changes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11:9. doi.org/10.1186/1471- 2415-11-9
  5. Van Den Bruel A, Gailly J, Devriese S, et al. The protective effect of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices on endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery: a meta-analysis using mixed treatment comparisons. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:5-10. doi.org/10.1136/ BJO.2009.158360
  6. Holzer MP, Tetz MR, Auffarth GU, et al. Effect of Healon5 and 4 other viscoelastic substances on intraocular pressure and endothelium after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:213-218. doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00568-X
  7. Maár N, Graebe A, Schild G, et al. Influence of viscoelastic substances used in cataract surgery on corneal metabolism and endothelial morphology: comparison of Healon and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1756-1761. doi.org/10.1016/S0886- 3350(01)00985-3
  8. Auffarth GU, Auerbach FN, Rabsilber T, et al. Comparison of the performance and safety of 2 ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:87-94. doi.org/10.1016/J.JCRS.2016.10.025
  9. Papaconstantinou D, Karmiris T, Diagourtas A, et al. Clinical trial evaluating Viscoat and Visthesia ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in corneal endothelial loss after cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2014;33:173-180. doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2013.845835
  10. Holzer MP, Tetz MR, Auffarth GU, et al. Effect of healon5 and 4 other viscoelastic substances on intraocular pressure and endothelium after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:213-218. doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00568-X
  11. Praveen MR, Koul A, Vasavada AR, et al. DisCoVisc versus the soft- -shell technique using Viscoat and Provisc in phacoemulsification: Randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1145- 1151. doi.org/10.1016/J.JCRS.2008.03.019
  12. Wood K, Pessach Y, Kovalyuk N, et al. Corneal endothelial cell loss and intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification using a new viscous-cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device. Int Ophthalmol. 2024;44:10. doi.org/10.1007/S10792-024-02997-Y
  13. Arshinoff SA, Wong E. Understanding, retaining, and removing dispersive and pseudodispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2318-2323. doi.org/10.1016/j. jcrs.2003.09.045
  14. Oshika T, Okamoto F, Kaji Y, et al. Retention and removal of a new viscous dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device during cataract surgery in animal eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:485-487. doi. org/10.1136/BJO.2005.085969
  15. Munk SJ, Heegaard S, Mosbech H, et al. Two episodes of anaphylaxis following exposure to hydroxypropyl methylcellulose during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:948-951. doi.org/10.1016/J.JCRS.2013.02.034
  16. Ucm R, Aem M, Lhb Z, et al. Comprehensive review on biotechnological production of hyaluronic acid: status, innovation, market and applications. Bioengineered. 2022;13(4):9645-9661. doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2022.2057760
  17. Rayner. rayner.com/en/ovd/ophteisbio/ 2024.
  18. Johnson & Johnson Vision. www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/ pdf11/P110007c.pdf 2024
  19. Yildirim TM, Auffarth GU, Son HS, et al. Dispersive viscosurgical devices demonstrate greater efficacy in protecting corneal endothelium in vitro. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019;4:227. doi.org/10.1136/ BMJOPHTH-2018-000227
  20. Wüst M, Matten P, Nenning M, et al. Thickness of the Protective Layers of Different Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices During Lens Surgery in a Porcine Model. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):28. doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.2.28
  21. Kretz FTA, Limberger IJ, Auffarth GU. Corneal endothelial cell coating during phacoemulsification using a new dispersive hyaluronic acid ophthalmic viscosurgical device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1879-1884. doi.org/10.1016/J.JCRS.2014.04.025
  22. Karaca C, Ozkose M, Unlu M, et al. Comparison of corneal wetting properties of different dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices. Retina. 2018;38:2137-2142. doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001854
  23. Bourne WM. Biology of the corneal endothelium in health and disease. Eye (Lond). 2003;17:912-918. doi.org/10.1038/SJ.EYE.6700559
  24. Malvankar-Mehta MS, Fu A, Subramanian Y, et al. Impact of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Cataract Surgery. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:7801093. doi.org/10.1155/2020/7801093
  25. Storr-Paulsen A, Nørregaard JC, Farik G, et al. The influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelial cell population during cataract surgery: A prospective study of cohesive and dispersive viscoelastics. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:183-187. doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0420.2006.00784.X
  26. Rhee DJ. Intraocular pressure trends aftersupranormal pressurization to aid closure of sutureless cataract wounds. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:546-549. doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(99)80053-4
  27. Wang SY, Azad AD, Lin SC, et al. Intraocular Pressure Changes after Cataract Surgery in Patients with and without Glaucoma: An Informatics-Based Approach. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020;3:343-349. doi.org/10.1016/J.OGLA.2020.06.002
  28. Ling JD, Bell NP. Role of Cataract Surgery in the Management of Glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2018;58:87. doi.org/10.1097/IIO.0000000000000234
  29. Mansberger SL, Gordon MO, Jampel H, et al. Reduction in intraocular pressure after cataract extraction: the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1826. doi.org/10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2012.02.050
  30. Storr-Paulsen A, Nørregaard JC, Farik G, et al. The influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelial cell population during cataract surgery: A prospective study of cohesive and dispersive viscoelastics. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:183-187. doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00784.x
  31. Zetterström C, Laurell CG. Comparison of endothelial cell loss and phacoemulsification energy during endocapsular phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21:55-58. doi. org/10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80480-4
  32. Ventura S, Wälti R, Böhnke M. Corneal thickness and endothelial density before and after cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmo.l 2001;85:18-20. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.1.18
  33. Duman R, Tok Çevik M, Görkem Çevik S, et al. Corneal endothelial cell density in healthy Caucasian population. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2016;30:236. doi.org/10.1016/J.SJOPT.2016.10.003
  34. Vaiciuliene R, Rylskyte N, Baguzyte G, et al. Risk factors for fluctuations in corneal endothelial cell density (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2022;23:129. doi.org/10.3892/ETM.2021.11052
  35. Oshika T, Okamoto F, Kaji Y, et al. Retention and removal of a new viscous dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device during cataract surgery in animal eyes. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:485-487. doi. org/10.1136/BJO.2005.085969