Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology 56 Original article Refractive Surgery in Children with Myopic Anisometropia and Amblyopia in Comparison with Conventional Treatment by Contact Lenses Autrata Rudolf https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2689-882X Krejčířová Inka https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3975-3830 Griščíková Lenka Doležel Zdeněk 30 4 2016 2 2

Our study evaluated the visual and refractive results of LASEK and anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation performed for high myopic anisometropia with amblyopia and contact lens intolerance in children compared with conventional treatment by contact lenses. Fourty-three patients (Group A) aged 3 to 7 years (mean, 5,6 years) with high myopic anisometropia and amblyopia had performed multizonal LASEK (27 eyes) or pIOL Verisyse implantation (16 eyes) on the more myopic eye in general anesthesia. Surgery was followed by patching of the dominant eye. Postoperative visual and refractive outcomes were analyzed and all children had minimally two years follow-up after procedure. Refractive surgical data were reported in standard format to describe safety, efficacy, predictability and stability of the procedure. This Group A of 43 children was compared with control Group B of 37 children (mean age 5,4 years), in whom myopic anisometropia and amblyopia were treated conventionally by contact lenses (CL) and patching of the dominant eye. Visual acuity (VA) and binocular vision (BV) outcome were analyzed and compared in both groups. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refraction in Group A was - 9,45 ± 2,47 diopters (D) (range -6.0 to -18.25 D) and the mean postoperative SE -1,48 ± 1,13 D (range + 0,75 to – 2,25 D). The mean preop. decimal uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) 0,023 ± 0,017 increased to 0,46 ± 0,18. The mean preop.decimal best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Group A was 0,28 ± 0.22 and changed to 0,78± 0,19 by 2 years after surgery. The mean BCVA in Group B was 0,23 ± 0,19, at start of CL correction and amblyopia therapy, and improved to 0,42 ± 0,15 after two years. The mean BCVA at final examination was significantly better in Group A (P < 0,05). Binocular vision improvement expressed by the proportions of subjects gained fusion and stereopsis, was overall better in Group A (81 %) than in Group B (33 %), (P < 0,05). There were no complications after surgery. Refractive surgery in children, multizonal LASEK and pIOL Verisyse implantation, are effective and safe methods for correction of high myopic anisometropia, and has an important role in the treatment of amblyopia in children when contact lens intolerance. Visual acuity and binocular vision outcomes were better in children who received permanent surgical correction of anisometropia, than in children conventionally treated by contact lenses.

 myopic anisometropia amblyopia children laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) anterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (AC pIOL) binocular vision References Agarwal A., Agrawal A., Agarwal T., Siraj A.A., et al.: Results of pediatric laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract Refract Surg, 2000; 26, 684–689. Alio J.L., Artol A., Claramonte P., Ayala M.J., Chipont E.: Photorefractive keratectomy for pediatric myopic anisometropia. J. Cataract Refract Surg, 1998; 24, 327–330. Astle W. F , Huang P.T., Ells A.L., et al.: Photorefractive keratectomy in children. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002; 28, 932–941. Autrata R., Řehůřek J.: Clinical results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for high myopic anisometropia in children: Four-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29, 4, p. 694- Autrata R., Řehůřek J.: LASEK and PRK versus Conventional Treatment of Myopic Anisometropic Amblyopia in Children : A prospective comparative study. European and Am J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004, 30, 1: 74–84. ISSN 0886-3350. Autrata R., Řehůřek J.: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia: Two-year follow- up. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29, 4, p. 661-668. ISSN 0886-3350. Birch E., Williams C., Hunter J., Lapa M.C., ALSPAC “Children in Focus” study team: Random dot stereoacuity of preschool children. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 1997; 34, 217–22. Birch E.E., Salomao S.R.: Infant random dot stereoacuity cards. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strab, 1998; 35, 86–90. Bluestein E.L.: PRK useful in some young patients with amblyopia – US study suggests. Eurotimes, 2001; 6, 28. Castillo A., Diaz-Valle D., Gutierrez A.R., et al.: Peripheral melt of flap after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Refract Surg, 1998; 14, 61–63. Claringbold T.V.: Laser-assisted sube- in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg, 1995; 11, 244–247. Collins J.W., Carney L.G.: Visual performance in high myopia. Curr Eye Res, 1990, 9, 217–223. Davidorf J.M.: Pediatric refractive sur - gery. J. Cataract Refract Surg, 2000; 26, 1567–1568. El Maghraby A.: Prospective randomi - zed bilateral comparison of laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Ophthalmology 1995; 102(suppl): 99. Epstein D., F agerholm P., Hamberg- Nystrom H., Tengroth B.: Twenty-four month follow- up of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Ophthalmology, 1994; 101, 1558–1564. Geggel H.S., Talley A.R.: Delayed onset keratectasia following laser in situ keratomileusis. J,Cataract Refract Surg, 1999; 25, 582–586. Gimbel H.V., Andreson Penno E.E., van Westenbrugge J.A., et al.: Incidence and management of intraoperative and early postoperative complications in 1000 consecutive laser in situ keratomileusis cases. Ophthalmology, 1998; 105, 1839–1847. Guell J., Muller A.: Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia from –7 to – 18 diopters. J Refract Surg, 1996; 12, 222–228. Jeffrey B.G., Birch E.E., Stager D.R. Jr, Stager D.R. Sr, et al.: Early binocular visual experience may improve binocular sensory outcomes in children after surgery for congenital unilateral cataract. J AAPOS, 2001; 5, 209–216. Knorz M.C., Liermann A., Wiesinger B., et al.: Correction of myopia using laser in situ keratomileusis. Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde, 1996; 208, 438–445. Kremer F., Dufek M.: Excimer laser Lee J.B., Seong J.G., Lee J.H., et al.: Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2001; 27, s. 565–570. Melki S.A., Talamo J.H., Demetriades A-M.: Late traumatic dislocation of laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flaps. Ophthalmology, 2000; 107, 2136–2139. Nano H.D. Jr, Muzzin S., Irigaray F .: Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy in pediatric patients. J. Cataract Refract Surg, 1997; 23, 736–739. Nucci P., Drack A.V.: Refractive surgery for unilateral high myopia in children. J AAPOS, 2001, 5, 348–351. Pallikaris I.G., Siganos D.S.: Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for correction of high myopia. J Refract Corneal Surg, 1994; 10, 498–510. Quiros P.A., Chuck R.S., Smith R.E., et al.: Infectious ulcerative keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol, 1999; 117, 1423–1427. Rashad K.M.: Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic anisometropia in children. J Refract Surg, 1999; 15, s. 429–435. Smith R.J., Maloney R.K.: Diffuse lamellar keratitis; a new syndrome in lamellar refractive surgery. Ophthalmology, 1998; 105, 1721–1726. Stodulka P.: LASIK = laser in situ keratomileusis.Initial experience. Čs Oftal, 1996;52, 73–81. Townshend A.M., Holmes J.M., E vans L.S.: Depth of anisometropic amblyopia and difference in refraction. Am J Ophthalmol, 1993, 116, 431–436. Walker M.B., Wilson S.E.: Incidence and prevention of epithelial growth within the interface after laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea, 2000; 19, 170– ISSN 0886-3350