<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">181</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31348/2021/X01</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Original article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Our Experience with Active Sentry and Centurion Ozil Handpieces</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Jirásková</surname>
            <given-names>Naďa</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Stěpanov</surname>
            <given-names>Alexandr</given-names>
          </name>
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8462-8756</contrib-id>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>11</day>
        <month>3</month>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <elocation-id>2</elocation-id>
      <abstract>
        <p>Aim: To compare parameters of phacoemulsification using handpiece Active Sentry and Centurion Ozil. Methods: We have evaluated results of 200 eyes of 129 patients that were operated for cataract at the Department of Ophthalmology. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon (NJ). In 100 eyes handpiece Active Sentry was used and in 100 eyes handpiece Centurion Ozil was used. The intraocular pressure during surgery (IOP), cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), ultrasound time (U/S time) and estimated consumption of balanced salt solution (BSS) were evaluated. Results: Using handpiece Ozil Centurion the IOP was 65 mmHg, use handpiece Active Sentry enabled decrease safely peroperative IOP to 46 mm Hg withouth increase of fluctuation or declension of stability of the anterior chamber. The mean CDE a U/S time were significantly statistically decreased using Active Sentry versus Centurion Ozil handpieces. Difference in estimated consumption of balanced salt solution was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our results proved that using handpiece Active Sentry enabled statistically significantly decrease IOP during phacoemulsification and eliminated post-occlusion surge. This brings several advantages: more painless surgery for patients and more user-friendly procedure for surgeon especially in challenging cases (intraoperative floppy iris syndrome or severe myopia).</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>phacoemulsification</kwd>
        <kwd>active fluidics</kwd>
        <kwd>peroperative intraocular pressure</kwd>
        <kwd>cumulative dissipated energy</kwd>
        <kwd>utrasound time</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="R4689">
        <mixed-citation>Pašta J, Mašek P et al. Fakoemulzifikace. 1. vydání. Praha: Mladá fronta, edice Aeskulap; 2015.334.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4690">
        <mixed-citation>Buratto L et al. Phacoemulsification:Principles and Techniques. 1st ed.Thorofare, NJ:SLACK;1998.518</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4691">
        <mixed-citation>Nicoli CM, Dimalanta R, Miller KM. Experimental anterior chamber maintenance in active versus passive phacoemulsification fluidics systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:157–162.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4692">
        <mixed-citation>Ostbaum SA. Effective cataract surgery – an undervaluated procedure. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:1471.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4693">
        <mixed-citation>Packard R. Comparing nuclear disassembly techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:460.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4694">
        <mixed-citation>Mamalis N. Phacoemulsification technology update. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:651–652.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4695">
        <mixed-citation>Ram J, Wesendahl TA, Auffarth GU, Apple DJ. Evaluation of in situ situ fracture versus phaco chop techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:1464–1468.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4696">
        <mixed-citation>Solomon KD, Lorente R, Fanney D, Cionni RJ. Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42: 542–549.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4697">
        <mixed-citation>Gonzales-Salinas R, Garza-Leon M, Saenz-de-Viteri et al. Comparison of cumulative dissipated evergy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification systém versus gravity-fluidics. Int Ophthalmol,2018; 35(5):1907–1913</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4698">
        <mixed-citation>Khokhar S, Aron N, Sen S, Pillay G, Agarwal E. Effect of balanced phacoemulsification tip on the outcomes of torsional phacoemulsification using an active-fluidics system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:22–28.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4699">
        <mixed-citation>Yeu E. A Clinical Study Review-the Role of Active Fluidics and Torsional Phaco Power in Providing a Stable and Efficient Cataract Surgery Environment. US Ophthalmic Review.2018; 11(1):32–37</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
